the object sounds like a newbie questions but there are good reason for it in the context of bridge-domains and vlan-stacking.
Here below a picture to give a bit of context
In short I realized that on the Huawei S5700 family for VLANs linked to bridge-domain I cannot use vlan-stacking.
The goal is to have tagged and untagged frames entering from the physical ports being properly marked stacked and then incapsulated into VxLAN.
Hence the idea to define two VLANs, one (4063) dedicated for vlan-stacking and the other one (4064 ) to be linked to the bridge-domain and the link between them esternal.
Is that bad? And how much?
Alex How bad is doing a back-to-back connection to do VLAN mapping (vlan-stacking limitation)?
More from Computer & InternetMore posts in Computer & Internet »
- BGP Timers – behavior when Graceful Restart is longer than Holdtime
- Does Junos prefer route with higher localpref even when the next hop of this route is unreachable?
- What is generating the /isan/etc/dcos_sshd_config file?
- Is there a reason to keep the BGP communities received from the uplinks?
- Connection partially unavailable if connected to modem but works when connected to router
Be First to Comment