Is "IPv10" a joke or a serious RFC draft?

        <a href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-ipv10/?include_text=1" rel="noreferrer"><em>Internet Protocol version 10 (IPv10) Specification</em></a>
The name is funny (IPv4 + IPv6 == IPv10), but the actual proposal looks strange (one more packet format to battle incompatibility between packet formats). Is it a normal proposal that have balanced pros and cons or just a minimally viable document to make fun of "IPv10" with a serious face? If serious, please describle it in a "tl;dr" fashion. Why this and not another transition technology like nat64/teredo?

Leave Your Comment

Leave a Reply