There are various passages of Mathew’s version that show Mathew’s editing of the gospel of Mark. Also, passages from the gospel of Mara are included, but Mathew expanded upon them, edited them, and reduced as well as rearranging the verses that appear in the Gospel of Mark. In certain passages, the Gospel of Mathew is closely similar to the arrangement scheme of Mark which is an indication that Mathew wrote his gospel by following the already existing gospel of Mark. It is because it is unlikely that there is a close similarity could only be out of coincidence. The reason behind Matthew’s interest in following the arrangement and ordering of Mark is not because he felt free to cut the gospel of Mark in pieces and reorder some of the events that have been said took place. However he felt free to use passages in cases that helped him suit his specific agenda through changing the passage’s meanings in the processes of careful arrangement of Mark’s gospel (Chong, 21).
Mathew chapters one and two are authentic to the book. Chapter 3 and 4 of the Gospel of Mathew start to follow the gospel of Mark. From chapter 5 to 13 much of the content in chapter 1 to five of Mark is a mixed form of interspersed salad within the original material of the gospel of Matthew. From Chapter fourteen onwards Matthew again follows the gospel of Mark and omits some few aspects and incorporation of some new material. Incorporating theses chapters we see Mathew returning to the gospel of Mark to pick up from where he left. Mathew does not follow the arrangement of Mark from chapter one to five, but he follows the same schema of the gospel of Mark from chapter 6 onwards in the gospel of mark. It shows that Mathew was aware of the gospel of Mark w and he makes the gospel of Mark be his priority. Also, the careful arrangement of parables found at the beginning of the gospel of Mark involves a strong polemical criticism on the Torah, and this explains why Mathew chose not to follow Mark up to chapter 6.
Mathew changes the story of Mark 9 because he considered Mark’s version to be much more of a Prophetic role, which was not a good picture during Mathew’s time. Therefore this made him edit the chapter so as to fit his theological agenda. In Mark, we get the perception that Jesus separated himself from being referred to as good and also from being *** for he says that *** is the real and true Good. For the case of Mathew’s gospel, we get the message that it is not possible to ask Jesus about what Goodness is. Also, why would he say that if he is a prophet of or *** why would he say such a thing?
In Matthew 17:1-13 and Mark 1 talk about the transfiguration of Christ. Both Mark and Mathew indicate that the transfiguration of Jesus took place six days after another major event while Luke indicates that it took place eight days after the event. Mark provides a description of Jesus’ clothes while Mathew talks about both his clothes and face. Mathew compares the clothes of Jesus to white light while Mark describes his clothes to be dazzling white and very white that no bleach in the world can achieve it (Boring, 201).
Boring, M. E (2012). The New Testament Introduction History, Literature, Theology. Westminster John Knox Press, 2012.
Chong, Ho You. Transfiguration Mark 9-10, Matt 17-9, Luke 28-36, John 12:28-30.
Carolyn Morgan is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in research paper writing services if you need a similar paper you can place your order from Top American Writing Services.