Monsanto and Genetically Modified Organisms

Question 1: How did we end up here?

Monsanto, a Biotech company, found a way to engineer seeds that would resist the Round-Up **** killer. As Monsanto continued to push farmers in different countries to accept their genetically modified crops, it was met with resistance from the European market. In the early years, the concept saw a dramatic uptake in the United States. Advocates cited increased agricultural production and savings on pesticide usage. The corporation began an introduction of genetically modified organisms in Europe. However, this was met with criticism as Consumer groups and environmentalists used the legacy of mad-cow disease to successfully wage an anti-GMO campaign in Europe. The problems began with speculations about scientific evidence began.  The pitched debate over genetically modified organisms had a significant impact on the corporation’s efforts to pursue its strategy in Europe. In response, the company made futile efforts to savage its image.  But critics continued questioning their environmental, social and economic effects. The scientific data provided was inconclusive or contradictory. Despite the already rough path, the industry’s public-relations crisis transformed into a transatlantic trade dispute that have seen researchers, farmers, activists and GM seed companies all piercingly promote their views.  The two sides have been speaking different languages and have different opinions on the GMO matter.

Question 2: How do we get where we want to be?

There are various efforts that must be undertaken to ensure that we can get where we want. The first step is carry out research studies that document the significant economic, social and environmental benefits or problem associated with GMO.  There are various reasons for consumers to be concerned about GMO.  On the other hand, scientists are producing conflicting findings on the possible safety and effects of GMOs. The findings are incongruent with the ideas of the funders or otherwise influenced by different parties. Of concern, this includes research conducted by public organizations. Hence, there is no scientific consensus about GMOs. There is a need for truly independent long-term safety research into the impacts of GMOs on our safety and the environment that ranges from **** and insect control, short-term and long-term safety on consumption, to increased crop yields.  With the global population expected to grow, there is a need for modern and sustainable agriculture.  These will alleviate come key concerns regarding GMO. Secondly, there is a need for standards on labeling; commercialization and market access that are compatible with WTO rules do guide these practices.  In the increasingly consolidated food industry, farmers have fewer and fewer options, and determining the best mechanism will go a long way in solving the crisis.

Question 3: How do we prevent a situation like this in the future?

Such situations can be prevented in future only if the safety of GMO is established. Although there has been increasing acceptance all the time, GMOs are often either labeled, banned or extremely restricted in many countries in the world including the entire European Union. What happens to human beings and the environment is a major concern.  Presently most of the crops including soy, corn, cottonseed, and canola have been genetically modified except for organic products. These particular foods are pervasive in countries’ food supply. If biotech corporations are allowed to push GMO products through, there will be no turning back. Eventually, it will affect the entire food supply system.  Additionally, corporations need to work in collaboration with researchers and trade organizations in future.

Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in essay writing services. If you need a similar paper you can place your order from cheap assignment writing service services.

Leave Your Comment

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: