Response for “in defense of fistfight”

Introduction

Chris Jones attempts to describe his beliefs as to the causes of people treating each other without respect and no fear of retaliation in his article “in the Defense of the Fistfight.” According to the author, it is necessary to be defensive though many people pretend to be not. It is a common behavior for people to be defensive, but they wish that their actions have no negative impacts on them. Thus, the author is for the belief that defensiveness is good to avoid mistreatment by others. His story helps to bring out more ideas about why being defensive is necessary and also the repercussions to the offenders. The response regards the ideas presented by Jones and supports the causes for people mistreating one another or being rude with no fear of retaliation. There are several supportive issues from the text for the position taken as described in the subsequent paragraphs.

As identified in the text, the people with a tendency to be peaceful empower the people who would otherwise be less confrontational (319). I think that Jones used the analogy of being peaceful since many people tend to take advantage of others thinking that they are less defensive. A significant number of people who portray a peaceful attitude tend to suffer from being offended by others and the offenders expect no negative retaliation. Some people may be less confrontational may offend others by their perceptions of the victim being peaceful. Jones believes that some instances require an individual to be defensive regardless of the consequences.

The behavior of other people may be a cause for mistreatment and being rude without fear of retaliation. I find it justifiable to engage in a confrontation after exploring all the available options to deal with an unpleasant character. In his story, Jones explain that there were guys engaging in some ritualistic clapping **** in a bar. He and his friends tried to enjoy their stay at the bar but could not. His attempts to ask them to stop were ineffective. The response was, “make us” and continued clapping louder (319). In reality, every person expects that others will respect them and listen to their pleas. However, when such expectations are not met, humans have a tendency to feel agitated. I find it appropriate that at such instances, one ought to take a step of retaliation without fear of the consequences.

Some actions are a total disrespect to an individual that compel them to react without fear of anything. As Jones describes, Jerry decided to lose a throat pony on his face that made him angry with Jerry to the point of being defensive. It was like the end of the road for him, and I support his decision of confronting the guy. According to my analysis, it is necessary to act defensively to avoid further mistreatment by people who think that their actions have no repercussions. I think that taking such an action helps to show the offender that none of them has the right to mistreat the other because there have to be consequences. I find it interesting to realize that many offenders think that their target victims lack the ability to react only to suffer from the effects of their retaliatory moves.

Another cause of people to be rude to others without fear of retaliation is the belief that they are above being edited (320). As such, they tend to offend others with a self-proclaimed victory thinking that nobody will take an action against them. Regarding Jone’s article, the guys who clapped uncontrollably at the bar thought that they were beyond reach by everybody else within the premise. It is a false feeling that tends to present people as above reach hence act without fear of retaliation. I think that many people have a general belief that all their actions are justifiable regardless of their consequences. The attitude makes them act uncontrollably as long as they drive their agenda. I think that Jerry could have controlled his behavior towards Jones if he understood the repercussions of his actions. He spat on Jones out of undermining him and thinking that he is above being edited.

According to Jones, our culture lacks the afterthought of consequence. It causes many people to mistreat others and have no fear of retaliation. I think that the culture is to blame since there are some people regarded as “bigger” than others and have the absolute right to behave uncontrollably. However, it is funny to realize that what goes around comes around (320). The same people who are rude to others are likely to suffer the same in other situations as a way of nature balance. The fact that every action has a consequence either good or bad is not an issue to many people. The offenders believe that the victims will not retaliate, hence perpetuate their actions without any fear.

In conclusion, it is evident that there are justified causes for people to treat others disrespectfully without any fear of retaliation. They think that the victims are naïve, and un-defensive, as well as themselves, being above reach. The culture also encourages the behavior since it lacks consequence. I believe that there are causes of people to act without fear of retaliation which make their actions justified in certain instances.

Work Cited

Jones C. “In the Defense of the Fistfight”, Chapter 7: Violence, pp. 319-320

Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in custom research paper writing service if you need a similar paper you can place your order for essay custom writing services.

Leave Your Comment

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: