Press "Enter" to skip to content

Social issues

It is imminent that every party and movement holds its objectives and opinions on certain matters that affect the livelihood of human beings. Therefore, before analyzing the intent of the party regarding a particular matter it is critical for one to understand the concepts of the movement. Based on the information provided by the Tea party, it is clear that the organizers of the movement narrow their range of activity to economic and deficient government issues (Burghart& Zeskind, 2010). The movement avoids any social issues that assist the movement to have a strong opinion on factors related to government failure and the impacts of the economy. On the hand, the Occupy Wall Street movement diverges on social and economical issues.
Both movements seek to gain exposure to the public in the upcoming from the DRNC event in 2015. The events agenda and purpose aligns with the ulterior motives of the two movements. The Tea House Party will probably use the event to propel its campaigns on the defects of the Obama government. The party seeks to gunner more support and creates awareness for its candidates (Burghart& Zeskind, 2010). Some of the major issues put forward on that day will be the Obama care and the staggering economic situation in the country. Similarly, the Occupy Wall Street movement seeks to gunner support for their movement in revolutionizing the world. Rather than focusing on the state the movement seeks to broaden its exposure on the basis of the challenges of the entire world and relate them to the state.
The constitution and the motives make the two parties different from other movements in the state. These two parties diverge on a concept as a platform that propels their campaigns across the nation (Steinbruner, 1974). As stated earlier every party contains distinct qualities that separate them from other movements. It is obvious that the Tea Party Movement and the Occupy Wall Street Movement differ from other parties (Van Gelder, 2011). They possess the unique structure and in the policy. Whereas most movement take stands on general issues affecting the state these two parties diverge on a particular range of issues (Steinbruner, 1974). The two movements advocate issues they consider of priority rather than changing the entire policy of the nation. Unlike most parties the both movements entail a free association between national and local groups (Steinbruner, 1974). These members define their policies and schedules without an ultimate leadership.
The Occupy Wall Street movement differs from the Tea Party movement as it mainly advocates for social and worldwide related issues (Van Gelder, 2011). The two parties differ from each other in the concepts of their platforms and standards and what they advocate for and against in the state. Occupy Wall Street movement focuses on the social and economic inequalities of the world whereas the Tea Party movement focuses on the economic and government related issues of the state. Both have a different view on the matter affecting the state due to these aspects of their platforms (Van Gelder, 2011).
I think it is secure to indicate that both parties have the right to air their views to the public; however the Miami-Dade Police Department command staff should focus on the safety of the citizens (Steinbruner, 1974). The policies employed by the police should follow the normal standards and disband any form of violent or unhealthy riots that may emerge. The department should get fully prepared for any situation as the odds of a violent riot emerging are high (Steinbruner, 1974). It is innevitable that there will be a clash of concepts as such the department should be ready to handle the situation.

Burghart, D., & Zeskind, L. (2010). Tea party nationalism: A critical examination of the tea party movement and the size, scope, and focus of its national factions. Kansas City, MO: Institute for Research & Education on Human Rights.

Van Gelder, S. (2011). This changes everything: Occupy Wall Street and the 99% movement. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Steinbruner, J. D. (1974). The cybernetic theory of decision: New dimensions of political analysis. Princeton University Press.

Carolyn Morgan is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in college research paper services. If you need a similar paper you can place your order from best medical essay service.

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: